Comments on: Pratt gives back his prize (John Howard still likes him)

By: peter smith

peter smith — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Forget Vizard. Old news. No criminal conviction, not even dishonest, just dumb. But if your going a lower threshold for handing back, think more broadly -Gerard, for tax matters;Alan Jones contempt etc; Kerry Stokes evidence disbelieved, no credibility e

By: miichael greaves

miichael greaves — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

whats with crikeys vizard vendetta. Predicted Vizard Insider Trading -wrong.Jail -wrong. Vizard Perjury -wrong. Vizard Foundation a sham - wrong. Tax evasion -wrong. Vizard accountant would get off-wrong.This one looks like a real winner too.

By: walt butler

walt butler — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

If settling up a civil matter after no criminal case can be cobbled together is grounds for VIzard then, Im all for casting the first stone too. All the Aussie sportmen and entertainers in Project Wickenby, Packer for Goanna etc (retrospective), Holling

By: Venise Alstergren

Venise Alstergren — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Its always interesting to see how quickly trash multiplies! Steve Vizard is so obviously trash the thought of him relinquishing his gongs, is unthinkable. Maybe its the Vatican image, Raheen, which makes me think Richard Pratt can’t be all bad. But he is.

By: Caroline

Caroline — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

I can tell you the real story on Gerardus Wykamp….but don’t know if you would have the resources to investigate this further.

By: mike smith

mike smith — Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000

Cardboard… Did he, perchance, supply the cardboard Kev?