Comments on: Comments, corrections, clarifications, and c*ckups http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/ now with extra source Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:22:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Daniel Lewis http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-2207 Daniel Lewis Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-2207 Ouch! Yet another devastating argument by Marilyn - I'm a clown. I'm sorry, but wasn't it you, Marilyn (and also Michael de Angelos) who seemed to have such an issue with "personal insults" and "ad hominem"? Then add hypocrisy to your collection of flaws Ouch! Yet another devastating argument by Marilyn - I’m a clown. I’m sorry, but wasn’t it you, Marilyn (and also Michael de Angelos) who seemed to have such an issue with “personal insults” and “ad hominem”? Then add hypocrisy to your collection of flaws

]]> By: Marilyn http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-2208 Marilyn Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-2208 Neil James should stick to trying to find the Iraqi WMD because he knows squat about the refugees, the people "smugglers" and what I have done to back up my claims. A search of senate committees might enlighten him. Neil James should stick to trying to find the Iraqi WMD because he knows squat about the refugees, the people “smugglers” and what I have done to back up my claims.

A search of senate committees might enlighten him.

]]> By: Michael de Angelos http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-2209 Michael de Angelos Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-2209 Neil Jame's patronising assertions that Ms Sheppherd freedoms to hold her views are courtesy of those who fought in wars is about as contemptible as one can get. Both James and Lewis use personal insults to denigrate others about their beliefs. Neil Jame’s patronising assertions that Ms Sheppherd freedoms to hold her views are courtesy of those who fought in wars is about as contemptible as one can get. Both James and Lewis use personal insults to denigrate others about their beliefs.

]]> By: Marilyn http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-2210 Marilyn Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-2210 James is a clown Daniel and so are you. Go away you tedious boy. James is a clown Daniel and so are you. Go away you tedious boy.

]]> By: Daniel Lewis http://www.crikey.com.au/2008/01/23/comments-corrections-clarifications-and-cckups/#comment-2211 Daniel Lewis Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-2211 Ouch, Marilyn. What a devastating rebuttal! If Neil James doesn't respond it can surely only be because he has thrown himself out the office window after such a crushing argument. Thank heavens you were merciful enough not to finish him with "nyah nyah"! Ouch, Marilyn. What a devastating rebuttal! If Neil James doesn’t respond it can surely only be because he has thrown himself out the office window after such a crushing argument. Thank heavens you were merciful enough not to finish him with “nyah nyah”!

]]>