<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rundle v Albrechtsen: Round 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/12/rundle-v-albrechtsen-round-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/12/rundle-v-albrechtsen-round-3/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agreed</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/12/rundle-v-albrechtsen-round-3/#comment-17018</link>
		<dc:creator>Agreed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17018</guid>
		<description>Now, post Howard, they are good for nothing. Ruthless Rupert won&#039;t waste his money on them. He likes to sidle up to power. With the Libs gone for at least ten years, who would employ them? They have compromised any reputation they ever had!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, post Howard, they are good for nothing. Ruthless Rupert won&#8217;t waste his money on them. He likes to sidle up to power. With the Libs gone for at least ten years, who would employ them? They have compromised any reputation they ever had!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McLoughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/12/rundle-v-albrechtsen-round-3/#comment-17019</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McLoughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17019</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be misled by Albrechtsen&#039;s sophistry and exhortation to respect for free speech. Exhibit 1 - unforgiveable axing of Alexandra De Blass and Earthbeat on ABC RN just after the 2004 election, specialised coverage of science of global warming, forests</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be misled by Albrechtsen&#8217;s sophistry and exhortation to respect for free speech. Exhibit 1 - unforgiveable axing of Alexandra De Blass and Earthbeat on ABC RN just after the 2004 election, specialised coverage of science of global warming, forests</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Janet fan?</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/12/rundle-v-albrechtsen-round-3/#comment-17020</link>
		<dc:creator>A Janet fan?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17020</guid>
		<description>I thought the Orwellian thing dripping with irony. She is not asking for tolerance, she is demanding indulgence, a job for life. Where is the support for a flexible labour market? If Rupert decides to bone her, figuratively speaking, what&#039;s to moan about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Orwellian thing dripping with irony. She is not asking for tolerance, she is demanding indulgence, a job for life. Where is the support for a flexible labour market? If Rupert decides to bone her, figuratively speaking, what&#8217;s to moan about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/12/rundle-v-albrechtsen-round-3/#comment-17021</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17021</guid>
		<description>A very well argued retort. The Australian has done a very good impersonation of Pravda as Rundle almost points out. It proved entirely irrelevant during the election campaign, putting News Corp&#039;s commercial interests above those of the Australian people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very well argued retort. The Australian has done a very good impersonation of Pravda as Rundle almost points out. It proved entirely irrelevant during the election campaign, putting News Corp&#8217;s commercial interests above those of the Australian people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/12/rundle-v-albrechtsen-round-3/#comment-17022</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Jobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-17022</guid>
		<description>I thought Michael Stutchbury was a more passionate defender of Janet Albrechtsen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Michael Stutchbury was a more passionate defender of Janet Albrechtsen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 561/571 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 14:47:05 -->
