<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crikey&#8217;s Election Tipping Comp right on the money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/crikeys-election-tipping-comp-right-on-the-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/crikeys-election-tipping-comp-right-on-the-money/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:54:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/12/10/crikeys-election-tipping-comp-right-on-the-money/#comment-25691</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-25691</guid>
		<description>May I suggest that perhaps a few people, like me, mistook the Coalition&#039;s primary vote question for the 2PP percentage. As this was around 47.5% it would explain why the 42.9% was the only figure to be off as it would have lifted the average submitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I suggest that perhaps a few people, like me, mistook the Coalition&#8217;s primary vote question for the 2PP percentage. As this was around 47.5% it would explain why the 42.9% was the only figure to be off as it would have lifted the average submitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 433/443 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 19:57:57 -->
