A NYT editorial has slammed Goldman Sachs for its role in the financial crisis, Ten must work out what to do with Australian Idol in 2010, how the media downturn will affect higher education, newsreaders get emo, and more.
Credit where it’s due for Rudd’s code of conduct
|
Kevin Rudd’s ministerial code of conduct takes several positive steps in the right direction, especially on the question of financial disclosure and conflicts of interest. It is certainly better than anything John Howard put up, including his original 1996 version. Under Rudd’s 18 month cooling off period for former ministers, we won’t be seeing a repeat of this shameful roll call of sheer greed, opportunism and conflict of interest:
Whilst it is unclear how such a ban will be policed – the Brits rely on a bipartisan committee to scrutinise post-parliamentary appointments – the pressure is now on the state Labor governments to follow suit, thereby preventing anyone else from “doing a Bob Carr”. Rudd deserves full marks for requiring all Ministers and their families to offload direct shareholdings, so we won’t see a repeat of John Moore’s active trading from the Defence Minister’s office, Santo Santoro’s frenetic day trading and Warwick Parer’s vast conflicts through mining exposures when Resources Minister. The question of ministerial accountability is a little less clear cut with Rudd giving himself plenty of wiggle room to blame public servants when things go wrong – something the NSW Labor Government has got down to an art form with more than 30 departmental and quango bosses sacked since 1995. The register for lobbyists is terrific and with positive moves afoot on FOI laws and Reserve Bank independence, this really only leaves the political donations disclosure regime as the major outstanding area and Special Minister of State John Faulkner is making positive noises. Having overseen the introduction of an anti-corruption watchdog in Queensland after the corruption of the Joh years, it is surprising there hasn’t been any debate about the PM doing something similar at a federal level. Oh well, you can’t get everything in life. |
|
|
|














One Comment
Not sure that the Fahey appointment would not happen under the guidelines. Investment banks do many things other than privatisations - overseas too. Ministers are not paid enough to cut off a future career and their value will fall vastly over 18 months.