http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/28/anti-union-campaign-did-what-it-was-supposed-to/ now with extra source Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:48:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/28/anti-union-campaign-did-what-it-was-supposed-to/#comment-22506 Philippa Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22506 I thought that the campaign was ok, but should not have been the ONLY strategy. It missed opportunities too - a week out from polling Keating had an article in SMH stating Work Choices only affected 5% of the workforce. Why wasn't it seized on by Lib ads? I thought that the campaign was ok, but should not have been the ONLY strategy. It missed opportunities too - a week out from polling Keating had an article in SMH stating Work Choices only affected 5% of the workforce. Why wasn’t it seized on by Lib ads?

]]> http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/28/anti-union-campaign-did-what-it-was-supposed-to/#comment-22507 Philippa Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22507 The campaign was ok, but should not have been the ONLY strategy. It missed opportunities too - a week out from polling Keating had an article in SMH stating Work Choices only affected 5% of the workforce. Why wasn't this seized on by Lib admakers? The campaign was ok, but should not have been the ONLY strategy. It missed opportunities too - a week out from polling Keating had an article in SMH stating Work Choices only affected 5% of the workforce. Why wasn’t this seized on by Lib admakers?

]]> http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/28/anti-union-campaign-did-what-it-was-supposed-to/#comment-22508 Philippa Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22508 The campaign was ok, but should not have been the ONLY strategy. It missed opportunities too - a week out from polling Keating had an article in SMH stating Work Choices only affected 5% of the workforce. Why wasn't this seized on by Lib admakers? The campaign was ok, but should not have been the ONLY strategy. It missed opportunities too - a week out from polling Keating had an article in SMH stating Work Choices only affected 5% of the workforce. Why wasn’t this seized on by Lib admakers?

]]> http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/28/anti-union-campaign-did-what-it-was-supposed-to/#comment-22509 Tony Papafilis Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000 #comment-22509 Right about class warfare though it really is more correct to term it the culture war. It's not just a simple divide on obvious issues but a divide on moral & social issues. Libs were intimidated by media from pushing cultural buttons but Labor did & won. Right about class warfare though it really is more correct to term it the culture war. It’s not just a simple divide on obvious issues but a divide on moral & social issues. Libs were intimidated by media from pushing cultural buttons but Labor did & won.

]]>