<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comitatus: Females saving Howard from a three figure drubbing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/16/comitatus-females-saving-howard-from-a-three-figure-drubbing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/16/comitatus-females-saving-howard-from-a-three-figure-drubbing/</link>
	<description>now with extra source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Papafilis</title>
		<link>http://www.crikey.com.au/2007/11/16/comitatus-females-saving-howard-from-a-three-figure-drubbing/#comment-19297</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Papafilis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-19297</guid>
		<description>What if Newspoll asked people for preferences rather than using preference flows from the last election when Libs did particularly well &amp; Labor very poorly on primary votes? Would we get a closer gap of (say) only 52- 48? Why is Newspoll afraid to ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if Newspoll asked people for preferences rather than using preference flows from the last election when Libs did particularly well &#038; Labor very poorly on primary votes? Would we get a closer gap of (say) only 52- 48? Why is Newspoll afraid to ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 433/443 objects using apc

Served from: www.crikey.com.au @ 2012-02-12 21:28:30 -->
