Why is everyone ignoring the nuclear elephant in the room?
|
The very largest elephant in Australia’s electoral room is the nuclear one — and it is accompanied by an equally large question: why is everyone, the media included, avoiding mentioning it? The Coalition obviously doesn’t dare remind voters that it has recommended building up to 25 nuclear reactors in Australia, all of which will have to be located near a source of water, meaning they will be in populated coastal areas or near lakes or rivers. Labor isn’t talking about this either. Can it be that, if they do, they will be wedged by Howard who will point out their hypocrisy in opposing nuclear power for Australia while supporting the mining and exportation of uranium? As for the media — Lazy? Ignorant? Intimidated? All three? (Reminder: Ron Walker, Chairman of Fairfax, is a partner with Hugh Morgan and Robert Champion de Crespigny in Australia Nuclear Energy Pty Ltd.) Here are some pointers for any members of the Fourth Estate with the guts to do some investigative journalism to bring the truth to the Australian people before November 24:
What kind of fools have we been taken for over the last eleven years? What assurance can we expect from the ALP that it will disown the Government’s nuclear plans, in all its forms, if it gains office? |
|
|
|








2 Comments
Hmmm… sheds new light on Dick Cheney’s interest perhaps - see:
US Vice-President keeps eye on Darwin-Alice link:
http://abc.net.au/news/politics/2003/01/item20030120091847_1.htm
(Of course this is purely circumstantial and doesn’t prove anything…)
Good on you Helen. See - Nuclear recycling plan condemned by US scientists http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/02/2080695.htm
and
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4090-uk-abandons-nuclear-fuel-reprocessing.html