Jetstar at Tulla, TAM at Sao Paulo. Spot the difference
|
An international A320 captain who has reviewed the preliminary Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) report into the botched Jetstar aborted landing at Melbourne Airport in July, says there is one element in common with the disaster the same month when TAM crashed the same type of jet into a building after failing to stop on the runway at Sao Paulo Airport. He says the incorrect positioning of the engine throttles is clearly identified in the ATSB report, and strongly indicated in disclosures from the continuing Brazilian investigation:
The ATSB says in the preliminary report that it is looking at those areas. But the questions as to how Jetstar could have allowed a bungle like the Melbourne incident to have occurred at all have not been answered. The TAM crash killed 199 people, including 12 in the building it struck. There were 138 passengers on the Jetstar flight that sank toward the ground while its crew dealt with what they thought was a failure of an automated system on the Airbus but was in fact an error already nailed in the preliminary report. In a response to the preliminary report Alan Joyce, the chief executive officer of Jetstar says:
His full statement can be read here. The preliminary report by the ATSB is here. |
|
|
|








One Comment
Stating the bleeding obivious I know, but I am still suprised this isn’t a mainstream press scandal. You need a high degree of torpor not to be interested in what was a major air disaster displaced a merciful few feet above the tarmac.