The Greens oppose the CPRS not because it is too weak, but because it will point Australia in the wrong direction with little prospect of turning it around in the timeframe within which emissions must peak, says Senator Christine Milne.
Blainey buckets the “one in a hundred year” hype
|
Bureaucrats, scientists, special interest groups and academics keen on making a dollar from disaster have discovered a new scam lately. They’ve started warning of “one in a hundred year” events – droughts, floods and fires. It’s great for the pen pushers. They rock up to their ministers with a warning about one in a hundred year events and they’re guaranteed to get their dough. Their masters know it’s great for them, too. They’re guaranteed a good run in the media. “If it bleeds, it leads” is the greatest maxim of Australian journalism. Hypothetical disasters are great to cover. There are no nasty facts to get in the way and you don’t need to leave your desk. Unfortunately, one of our leading historians has come along to rain on the drought. Geoffrey Blainey has offered his thoughts on the situation in his home state of Victoria. “We forget that farming is almost a crisis industry,” he writes. He offers a historian’s perspective on the weather in the Herald Sun:
He also offers some perspectives on politicians:
Blainey is correct. Much of our present situation with water is due to the failure of state politicians to invest in infrastructure. Ironically, much of the problem is also due to their failure to send a proper price signal to consumers, too – to put a cost on water that would lower consumption, lower demand for infrastructure but also provide funds that could help pay for its appropriate expansion. But it’s much easier for politicians and parasites on the public purse to talk of one in a hundred year events. No-one is to blame for them – but they require urgent spending. Now. |
|
|
|














2 Comments
Yeah well Christian, you might have also mentioned that in olden days, the populace paid for their “cheap water” via taxes, apparently without complaint, the alternative being, as the populace pre 1930 found out, no water. Price signals? Hogwash!
Yeah well Christian, you might have also mentioned that in olden days, the populace paid for their “cheap water” via taxes, apparently without complaint, the alternative being, as the populace pre 1930 found out, no water. Price signals? Hogwash!