More deals, more conflicts for the Rudd family business empire
|
The Rudd family business interests are back in the news after Therese Rein’s British business won a lucrative $200 million contract to help up to 1 million people with disabilities find work. The British unions are upset that WorkDirections UK isn’t guaranteeing all the conditions of civil servants transferring across to work for the Rudds, but the bigger issue here once again goes to potential conflicts of interest. Therese Rein has previously promised to sell her Australian division– which gets most of its revenue from the federal government – but, frankly, there are a few problems with these UK deals as well. The UK is one of our closest allies and here we have the British Labour Government paying vast sums to a company which will directly benefit an incoming Australian Labor Prime Minister. And when it comes to conflicts, the Rudd family share portfolio is also a shocker, even if they have retrospectively been transferred into a blind trust. Such a move only works if you cash in all the stocks and then the trustee buys afresh, but there’s no suggestion that has happened. Applied to the disclosure from last December, this is how much of the most inappropriate holdings are now worth after a few more months of sharemarket boom:
It would be hard to pick a more government-dependent portfolio. When my wife was elected to the RACV board, I had to sell my $500 worth of shares in Insurance Australia Group because the two companies are in a joint venture. If the Rudds move into the Lodge, surely all these shares should simply be sold, along with the job placement business. There’s no bigger commitment that being Australia’s first couple – and in financial terms you’ve just got to be cleaner than clean. Besides, how many tens of millions does a Prime Minister’s family need to make. |
|
|
|








5 Comments
Is this article about the divesting of interests or the nature of Ms Rein’s business in the UK? If it is the former then it seems irrelevant, if it is the latter it seems disingenuous to stretch the idea of the special relationship between the UK and Aus.
sloppy work Stephen.
1 British unions are objecting to their government privatising employment placement services not to any particular company. Check the ABC site.
2 Our 1st family (such as it is) is the Governor General’s not the Prime Minister’s
Stephen, he probably owns the Ramsay shares because their biggest hospital Greenslopes is in his electorate.
Stephen, he probably owns the Ramsay shares because their biggest hospital Greenslopes is in his electorate.
Even sloppier than you think because it sounds just like Piers Akerman writing after not bothering to find out that the company has been delivering for 5 years and the new contracts don’t start until December 3.