A NYT editorial has slammed Goldman Sachs for its role in the financial crisis, Ten must work out what to do with Australian Idol in 2010, how the media downturn will affect higher education, newsreaders get emo, and more.
Laurie and Cheryl, Kruddy and the strippers – and poison from the dwarf
|
“Let it go Laurie. None of us is a paragon of virtue.” Or So Glenn Milne wrote in The Australian back in 2002 when Laurie Oakes went into print with the Cheryl and Gareth yarn. So why did he think Kevin Rudd’s brief visit to a strip club was so notable? “Oakes’s decision to both publish and broadcast this story was driven by other motivations,” Milne claimed. “At the very best this was simply a matter of titillation. At worst, something darker.” Something darker? That’s exactly what Kevin Rudd has suggested was behind Milne’s little bit of Sunday sleaze. And the titillation angle was covered, too, with the line: “But, according to some sources, Mr Rudd was warned against touching the dancers by Scores management.” To be fair to Milne’s 2002 comments, these points from his piece are pertinent:
But then he lurched into lurid hyperbole:
When political journos launch into “But what about the children territory” it’s time to get worried. Or decide that you’re going to rely on Who Weekly for all your news. “None of us is a paragon of virtue,” Milne wrote in 2002, referring to adultery. Kevin Rudd’s alleged offence is much more minor. For once, the euphemism is accurate. It was “an error of judgement”. Back in 2002, Milne frothed:
So what’s changed in the past five years? |
|
|
|













