Political interference in medical research and advocacy: send us your examples
|
On Wednesday, The New York Times reported how former Surgeon General Dr Richard H. Carmona, who held the peak health advisory position from 2002-06, had told a US Congressional panel on Tuesday “that top Bush administration officials repeatedly tried to weaken or suppress important public health reports because of political considerations.” He listed a Niagara of verboten topics that he was told he was not to speak or write about, including stem cells, emergency contraception, s-x education, and prison, mental and global health issues. He described how a major report on environmental tobacco smoke had been delayed for years with attempts made to dilute its findings. He claimed he was “ordered to mention President Bush three times on every page of his speeches”. Administration officials even discouraged him from attending the Special Olympics for the disabled being told ‘Why would you want to help those people?’ The new appointee, James Holsinger, is now in damage control overdrive swearing to uphold the independence of the office. Today it is taken for granted in the Australian health and medical community that governments are increasingly sweeping aside any tired old notions of respect for independent expertise when it comes to anything they don’t like. NGOs and university researchers are treated like branch offices of government waiting sheepishly to be brought into line with latent and sometimes overt threats of withdrawn support. A few examples:
If you know of examples of overt government punishment of health and medical research and policy advocacy – state or federal – send your evidence to boss@crikey.com.au |
|
|
|







