A NYT editorial has slammed Goldman Sachs for its role in the financial crisis, Ten must work out what to do with Australian Idol in 2010, how the media downturn will affect higher education, newsreaders get emo, and more.
Government ads reach fever pitch
|
Australian Government advertising seemed to reach fever pitch in the weekend newspapers. All in the public interest naturally.
With the Government busy defending the extra taxpayer-funded expenditure required to overhaul its WorkChoices campaign, the weekend’s glut wasn’t an ideal look. This morning Prime Minister John Howard spoke on the matter of ad spend on ABC’s AM.
Since the Howard Government came to office, it has spent $1,655,854,961 on government advertising, estimates the office of Penny Wong, Shadow Minister for Public administration and Accountability, with the yearly spend increasing significantly over this period. They break down the latest government ad costs thus:
And, they note, there’s another spend on the way thanks to ”Operation Re-education – cost unknown”. Howard’s taxpayer-funded advertising blitz could be expanded to include a prime-time campaign to tackle teachers’ unions “misinformation” on schools funding, reports Samantha Maiden in The Oz today. But are any of the current individual campaigns getting heard above the din? One message is coming in loud and clear. Your government is working for you, whoever you are. WORKERS:
ASTHMATICS AND PARENTS OF ASTHMATICS:
AGED PERSONS:
MOTHERS AND DAUGHTERS:
TWENTYSOMETHINGS:
RETIREES:
YOUNG PEOPLE/GREY NOMADS:
PAROCHIALISTS:
ASPIRATIONALISTS:
THE ECO-CONSCIOUS:
Given the hogging of newsprint, one government ad in particular took our fancy.
If this keeps up, we’d want to be. |
|
|
|














