A NYT editorial has slammed Goldman Sachs for its role in the financial crisis, Ten must work out what to do with Australian Idol in 2010, how the media downturn will affect higher education, newsreaders get emo, and more.
NSW Labor exploits “other receipt” confusion
|
Crikey’s lists of the biggest political donations for 2005-06 in last Thursday’s edition quite rightly focused on entries that were defined as “donations”. Our figures largely ignored those defined as “other receipts” because in the past these have these have been limited to things such as reimbursements from the tax office and public funding. For instance, the $1.07 million “other receipt” from Adelaide Bank declared by the NSW ALP in 2004-05 wasn’t a donation, but simply interest earned from funds on deposit. However, NSW Labor is now rorting this definitional confusion in a huge way and claiming most contributions it receives are “other receipts”. The party declared 384 contribution totalling $12.26 million in 2005-06 but only 20 of these worth $350,000 were actually classified as “donations”. These are the biggest NSW ALP “donations” we published last Thursday:
Now, compare that with the following complete list of all contributions above $20,000 that NSW Labor pocketed in 2005-06 when you include “other receipts”:
Labor has clearly put together a huge war chest for the coming campaign but who are they kidding in claiming developers such as Australand, Mirvac, Grocon and Walker Corp are not actually donating but instead providing some other service? If these beneficiaries of NSW Government decisions are not simply writing out cheques then the exact nature of the benefit should be properly disclosed, not just lumped in with everything else in an indecipherable way. |
|
|
|













