Wall St was down 94 overnight, its biggest fall in a month, while the local market is down 66.
Why Shoaib and other athletes can’t use steroids to beat injury
|
Shoaib Akhtar is the latest to wear the label “drug cheat”, as he and fellow Pakistani fast bowler, Mohammad Asif, head home in disgrace from the Champions Trophy after failing tests for the steroid Nandrolone. Of course, Shoaib was shocked and mystified, vowing that he had never knowingly taking a banned substance, which puts him up there with Tour de France winner Floyd Landis, baseballer Barry Bonds and almost every other athlete ever to return a positive test. For all Crikey Sport knows, Shoaib may well be telling the truth, which would suggest that the real scandal in world sport is not cheating athletes – it’s the dastardly doctors and other assistants who lurk around every corner, just waiting to pop unknown and career-devastating substances into the mouths of poor, innocent athletes. One thing not in doubt is that both Akhtar and Asif have recently returned from injury, raising the suggestion that Nandrolone might have played a role in their recovery. Rather than just tut-tut from afar, let’s ask the question: why can’t an athlete use a steroid to recover from a specific injury? If you had a dodgy hamstring, for example, why can’t you receive medical clearance for a specific and targeted course of steroids, supervised by independent doctors, to recover more quickly? Not to bulk up, not to deliberately get a performance edge – simply to be fit again. Richard Ings, the chairman of ASADA, the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority, said the answer is simple: a sports injury is not serious enough to warrant the health risks of steroids. Ings said:
|
|
|
|













